elementic.devEarly access

The context layer for your design system

Design system intelligence for humans and AI agents.

Your agent can write the change. Give it the context to understand the consequences—components, usages, owners, and what to visual-test.

Explore the workspace See the widgets

Built for design system teams. Available to agents through MCP.

acme / design-system
Illustrative workspace
Agent conversation MCP example
YOU

I’m updating Button. What else needs attention?

elementic / component.impact

Found Button in the UI package. A spacing change reaches 3 dependent components and their consuming screens.

packages/ui/src/button.tsx

Owner: Design Platform · involve Checkout

Visual-test: Toolbar, Dialog, CheckoutForm

Suggested next action
Review the 4 spacing overrides before migrating usages.

Button/ ui
Indexed

Dependency map

3 direct dependents
Button
Toolbar
Dialog
CheckoutForm

12

usages

3

dependents

2

teams

Evidence first. Recommendations second.
Context, where you work.ClaudeCursorChatGPTOther MCP clients

From question to informed change

Less searching.
More understanding.

Not six disconnected tools. One thread of context, from finding a component to improving the system around it.

Locate01

The right component. Not another copy.

Find its source, variants, and usages across your codebase.

Preview02

See what your agent sees.

Render components and their states directly in the conversation.

Trace impact03

One change. The whole picture.

Trace dependent components and the screens that consume them.

Collaborate04

Know who needs to be involved.

Connect component ownership to the teams affected by a change.

Test05

Check the right surfaces.

Identify which dependent components need visual testing.

Refactor06

Turn context into a next step.

Prioritize improvements and give your agent context for refactoring.

System intelligence

Metrics are a starting point.
The next move matters.

Understand the findings behind each recommendation. Let your team decide what happens next.

Component adoptionOpportunity

78%

22 of 100 sampled UI usages are local implementations.

Recommended action

Review local alternatives to shared components.

Evidence · 100 sampled usages

Spacing overridesSuggested

4

Button has 4 local padding overrides in Checkout.

Recommended action

Consolidate spacing into a supported variant.

Evidence · Button / Checkout

Unowned componentsReview

3

3 indexed components have no mapped team owner.

Recommended action

Review ownership with Design Platform.

Evidence · Ownership mapping

Illustrative findings, not live customer data.

TOKENspace.3COMPONENTButtonSTORYButton / PrimaryCOMPONENTDialogUSAGECheckoutTEAMPaymentsTESTVisual testCHANGEPR #482

Illustrative graph, not live repository data.

Component knowledge graph

Your design system
is already a graph.

Tokens, components, stories, usages, teams, tests and changes — linked, so every answer comes with its path.

Where is Button used?

Button → Dialog → Checkout

Who should review this change?

PR #482 → Button → Checkout → Payments

Which visual tests should run?

space.3 → Button → Button / Primary → Visual test

Use cases

One graph. Many questions.

  1. 01

    Change impact & test selection

    Trace what a change touches and run only the right visual tests.

  2. 02

    Adoption & drift

    Find forks, hard-coded values, and outdated versions across apps.

  3. 03

    Deprecations & migrations

    Locate every legacy usage and propose migrations repo by repo.

  4. 04

    Design-to-code checks

    Compare Figma components with code and flag mismatches.

  5. 05

    Accessibility & performance

    Per-component health with the affected screens attached.

  6. 06

    Guidance for agents

    Tell coding agents which component to use, and which to avoid.

  7. 07

    Ownership & governance

    Owners, readiness, and release notes generated from real changes.

Pull-request check

Every PR knows
what it touches.

Impact, the right reviewers, only the affected visual tests, coverage gaps and design-system rule warnings — posted on the pull request. Planned via a GitHub App or a command-line step in any CI.

GitHubGitLab CIBitbucketCircleCIBuildkite

Proposed integrations, not yet available.

PR #482 / Elementic checkEXAMPLE

PR #482 · Tighten Button padding

Button → 3 dependents · 12 usages · 2 apps

Requested reviewers

Design Platform · Payments

Selected visual tests

Button / Primary

Dialog / Actions

CheckoutForm / Submit

Toolbar has no mapped story

Hard-coded color #FF5A1F in checkout/summary.tsx

Suggested releaseminor

Example comment. No real pull request was reviewed.

Works with Storybook

Bring your Storybook.
Elementic makes it intelligent.

01

Import

Connect your existing Storybook. Stories become previews, states, and test targets.

02

Enhance

Elementic adds impact paths, ownership, coverage gaps, and generated stories.

03

Optionally migrate

Move to Elementic’s own preview when you’re ready — never required.

One MCP connection

Your agent.
Your components.
Shared context.

Bring component intelligence into the tools your team already uses. Source, previews, ownership, and impact—available in the same conversation.

ClaudeCursorChatGPT
mcp.config.json / example
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "elementic": {
      "url": "https://mcp.elementic.dev"
    }
  }
}

Illustrative connection address. Access details to be confirmed.

For design system & platform teams

Give your agent
component sense.

Build with the system you have. Understand what your next change touches.

Early-access registration coming soon.